by Laura Gruner
Updated on January 8, 2024
German Cases: Explained
Yay. What else to do with your evening than struggle with German cases? Again. Without getting anywhere near understanding why the hell Germans do that crazy thing to their articles and pronouns. Wouldn’t it be so much easier, if they just had the as the English or we could even go for two articles, masculine and feminine, but the extra neutral one and the four different cases really is quite decadent.
Champagne, anyone? Well actually, you should really put the champagne in the fridge now, so that once you’ve read this blog post you can finally drink it whilst understanding the German cases.
A basic information we need to know before we start the fun, is that Germans …I mean German sentences and their word order are pretty flexible. The only thing that stands as solid as the bouncer in Berghain, is the verb. It comes in the second position of a sentence. “Tell us something new”, you say. “In English the verb also comes second, after the subject.” you might yawn. But that is just the point: after the subject. In German, the subject doesn’t necessarily have to come first in a sentence. The first position is the spotlight of a sentence. This is where the attention goes to, so, everyone (in this case, every component) wants its five minutes of fame. That is why, you could start your sentence with an object, for example:
Diesen schönen Kuchen hier werde ich jetzt essen. – This beautiful cake here I’m going to eat now.
Even though it might be quite clear here, who is eating who, there are cases where it is not that obvious and we need the articles as the case marker to tell us what is the subject and what is the object.
So, let’s have a closer look.
Let’s start with the most basic case: The nominative is the case you’ll find in your friendly dictionary.
If you open it and look for champagne, you’ll find der Champagner. If you look for me, you’ll find a little monster between the pages stuffing its face with ice-cream…no, wait…that’s somewhere else…you’ll find ich and so on.
The nominative is reserved for the subject. That is the person or the thing that does the action the verb is talking about:
Ich esse. – I eat. …and I don’t have to tell the whole world that it is tons of chocolate.
Here, it is ich (I) who does the eating.
Der Stuhl bricht zusammen. – The chair breaks down. …oops, too much chocolate…
And here it is der Stuhl (the chair) that does the breaking down (me, I might only burst at some point).
So far so good, but there is a little tricky verb, a usual suspect for doing crazy grammar stuff actually, the verb sein (to be).
Ich bin ein Eichhörnchen – I’m a squirrel.
You’d think: “Easy peasy, first one is the subject, second one the object” But no, the verb “to be” is the verbal form for an equation: “Ich=Eichhörnchen” That’s why, the “Eichhörnchen” is a nominative, too.
To reassure you, there are only a few verbs that pull that little stunt and their meaning is close to “to be”: werden (to become) and bleiben (to stay).
First of all, let me tell you here, that cases other than the nominative can be demanded mostly by two different kinds of words: verbs and prepositions.
Whereas the verb demanding a certain case has some logic in it, there is none to (most of) the prepositions. Just learn them. Full stop.
That said, we can move our attention to the part that actually can be explained.
While in our first exemplary phrases I didn’t have to give you any extra information, but I could have done it, there are certain verbs that demand extra information.
This extra information can be given as a direct or an indirect object. For now, the direct object is interesting for us. Direct in this case means the object, which can be a person or a thing, is directly affected by the action of the sentence. The direct object is always accusative.
Ich knutsche meinen Partner. – I smooch my partner.
Here, meinen Partner (my partner) is affected by the action-he feels a very humid and big imprint of my lips on his cheek.
Die Lehrerin beoachtet ihren Schüler beim Nasebohren. – The teacher watches her student picking his nose
In this sentence the student suffers the action of being watched (and laughed at, probably).
But just imagine this case: The teacher was male too, we didn’t have the different cases in German, but still a flexible word order.
We would say:
Der Lehrer beobachtet *der Schüler beim Nasebohren. – The teacher watches the student?
Der Schüler beobachtet *der Lehrer beim Nasebohren. – The student watches the teacher?
Who is watching who? Oh no, is the teacher being watched and has lost all his authority, forever? Luckily for the teacher, we have the cases and can state:
Der Lehrer beobachtet den Schüler beim Nasebohren. – Teacher watches student.
Den Schüler beobachtet der Lehrer beim Nasebohren. – Teacher still watches student. Only here, the student is highlighted.
Phew, a last-minute rescue for our teacher!
So, long story short: The direct object has its name because it is directly affected by the action of a sentence. The direct object is in accusative.
As there is a direct object, there will be an indirect one as well. The indirect object is always in dative.
It is not directly affected by the action of the sentence. There rather is a kind of transfer, the object is something given to. It becomes quite obvious with verbs that require two objects like geben (to give), erklären (to explain) or wünschen (to wish).
Ich erkläre den tollen Lesern des Lingodablogs die vier Fälle. – I explain the four cases to the amazing readers of the Lingoda blog.
I transfer you my knowledge. And attentive as you are, you noticed that the knowledge here is the one that is affected by the act of transferring. Therefore it is in accusative.
There are also verbs that only demand the dative. You can either just learn them or follow the same logic of the dative object being a receiver.
Ich helfe dir. – I help you. Basically, you receive my help here.
…or the audience to whom something is transferred:
Ich versichere dir, dass ich gestern mit Johnny Depp essen war. – I assure you, that went out to eat with Johnny Depp yesterday. – Is it actually obvious that I’m writing with an empty stomach right now?
Don’t forget, you really must make sure you understand your prepositions.
Even Germans, the ones speaking certain dialects, tend to ignore the genitive and replace it with a dative, but if everyone was honest, it is not only German teachers who have their ears bleeding when they hear that. The genitive sounds nicer and more correct.
It is also more economic as you can save a preposition by using it.
The genitive describes possession or rather the possessor, so the person or thing that possesses something. If the possessor is a name, than the genitive is pretty easy, because it just as in English:
Lauras Magen knurrt. – Laura‘s belly rumbles.
With every other noun you have to change the article and for masculine or neuter nouns, you add an -s at the end:
Ich erkläre den tollen Lesern des Lingodablogs die vier Fälle. – I explain the four cases to the amazing readers of the Lingoda blog. The genitive article “des” means “of the”. And you could even rephrase it in German:
Ich erkläre den tollen Lesern von dem (vom) Lingodablogs die vier Fälle. But it is a lot more circuitous this way.
And of course, there are certain genitive prepositions, too.
So, ich muss jetzt endlich die leckeren Muffins meiner Mutter essen gehen. – So, now finally, I have to go eat the yummy muffins of my mum.
Ich wünsche euch einen guten Appetit…ähm…viel Erfolg.
